Get started with your PeaceJam education through our programs, curriculum, and presentations
Connect with PeaceJammers and learn about the people who inspire us
Get involved with the Global Call to Action and PeaceJam's Service Learning programs
Yes she has great style, but...
Posted 8/26/2010 at 10:06 AM by Bradlee A
Michelle Obama. The First Lady of the United States of America. Grew up on the South Side of Chicago. Graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School. Lawyer, mother of two beautiful children, and an amazing, amazing speaker. Yet, it seems the only time she can grab a spot on the Front Page of Huffington Post is for what she wears.


“Obama goes sleeveless at” (event name here). “First Lady sports black for” (event name here). These are the types of articles that gain exposure for who I hope will be the first female President of the United States of America.

Wait a tic, did you just say she went sleeveless? Like WHERE!?!

I’ve been having an occasional feud with a few readers of the Huffington Post in the “Style” section of all places. Am I so out of line to call out people who care more about what she wears than her quest to reduce childhood obesity?

Ewww, like fat kids are gross.

The reason these articles get on the front page is quite simple: people click on them. The number of clicks means more ad revenue for HuffPo.

Luckily, today when I went to the front page there were no articles on Michelle Obama’s attire. There were no articles on Mrs. Obama’s good works either. But when I went to the “Style” page on HuffPo, there were three articles on the First Lady’s garb. I took screen shots of each and posted them in this blog. Notice how many comments are on each. When PeaceJam was highlighted in the Huffington Post, we had a hard time getting 20 comments.


Three articles. This frustrates me. I’d like to live in a world where an incredibly intelligent woman, who is making the world a better place, gets news coverage for who she is and what she’s doing. Not what she’s wearing. I have a dream, that someday woman will not be judged by the color of their outfits, but for her sheer awesomeness as human being.

I’d be lying if I told you that I spend hours commenting on these articles. But I’d also be lying if I said it didn’t get my goat.

OMG, I love goats! Does yours wear the Versace Goat Hugger?


What do you think? Should I get all riled up from stuff like this? Afterall, First Lady attire has been a hot topic of so many past presidencies from Edith Wilson to Jackie Kennedy Onassis and everyone needs distractions. But should this be such a hot topic? Should people be obsessing over what Michelle Obama wears? Is it degrading?

Post a comment below if you’d like to chime in.
Share |
Betsy L wrote:
I think you should get riled up about this Brad. I never noticed this until I heard you talking about it. I appreciate you putting your voice out there. It's upsetting that Michelle Obama is not being recognized for her work. Who cares what she is wearing? It's sad that ad sales are more important to the Huff than how they present the First Lady to their readers.
posted 8/26/2010 at 10:28 AM
Bradlee A wrote:
Who cares what she is wearing?

Agreed! Especially since what she's wearing is out of style 4 months after she wears it.

It's sad that ad sales are more important to the Huff than how they present the First Lady to their readers.

I'm a firm believer that we drive what HuffPo, Yahoo!, etc. reports on. So if people keep clicking on cute animal videos, more "news" outlets are going to have cute animal videos because they need to make a living, and a lot of times the general public doesn't get them to click on the stories I feel everyone should be reading (genocide in Dafur, rigged elections in Burma, etc.). So I feel the blame falls on we the people, which is why I try to call people out on the fact they love the dress the First Lady is wearing. I call fashion, especially in this case, a huge distraction from what's really important.

There are some news outlets that don't use the cute animal videos to snag readers to their site. NY Times & the Wall Street Journal are two off the top of my head, however, they're having to fire staff left and right and will soon be charging people to come to their websites (something that will push people even more to the rags that highlight whatever makes ad bank).

My point: I feel we need to be the ones to avoid clicking on certain stories so the publication doesn't get validation for reporting on crap.
posted 8/27/2010 at 10:33 AM
Dawn E wrote:
I would love to see more coverage of the actual work that Mrs. Obama is doing to help America... who cares what she wears while she does it!
posted 8/28/2010 at 10:43 AM
© 2008 - 2012 The PeaceJam Foundation