Get started with your PeaceJam education through our programs, curriculum, and presentations
Connect with PeaceJammers and learn about the people who inspire us
Get involved with the Global Call to Action and PeaceJam's Service Learning programs
Is “Vengeance” Our Middle Name?
Posted 2/3/2010 at 3:02 PM by Bradlee A
I have an appetite for revenge.

I recently came to this conclusion while struggling through Quentin Tarantino’s latest, Inglourious Basterds. I wouldn’t recommend this movie to anyone who has eyes or ears. Even though it was nominated for an Oscar, I still contend it was terrible. I’d like to say that this movie glorified violence and killing, but this verdict falls way short. It mocked every human being working for peace with the blood and gore that was carelessly splashed into the eyes of the viewer, taunting us with a promise that every witness would be completely desensitized to all violence in a mere three hours. Tarantino thinks he is funny and his joke is death. If his quest was to make the average viewers uncomfortable and to question why they enjoy action movies, it was a magnificent success.

Another movie I recently saw that made me cringe, was Law Abiding Citizen, with Jamie Foxx and Gerard Butler. The blatant violence in it is nothing short of horrific at times. I glanced at my girlfriend with apologetic eyes at multiple occasions through the movie for even suggesting we see it.

I, however, didn’t go into these movies feeling they would be bad. In fact I was looking for some harmless big-screen fun where good not only conquers the bad, it decimates it. But I noticed a feeling in myself when I was watching both. During the scenes where the righteous heroes get revenge on the do-badders, I had a feeling of teeth-gritting satisfaction; a “hell-yeah” or “stick it to ‘em” that resonates with a lot of movies I’ve watched.

The worst part of the epiphany was that I knew I wasn’t alone in this feeling of satisfaction. Others in the theater started laughing when on screen villains died. Cheers of joy and clapping spontaneously erupted when vengeance was taken.

When multiple people in the theater shout and cheer when a blood is spurting from someone’s neck, or when a theater of people engulfs in flames, it really makes you consider why you decided on that movie. I began to ask myself, Why do I, why do so many of us, take satisfaction in seeing someone on screen being harmed after they have inflicted harm on another? Why do we revel in vengeance?

The feeling conjured up past instances where I’ve felt the same thing.

After the terrorist attacks of 9/11 when the United States attacked Al Qaeda in Afghanistan I unfortunately felt good, after all, nobody screws with the United States of America. When we attacked Iraq in 2003, although I was feeling like it was incredibly rushed, I still felt a bit of satisfaction. I even remember as far back as 1990. I was eight years old, watching the U.S. rain bombs down on Baghdad in August of that year and I felt good about it. A little “hell yea” went through my eight-year-old mind because I thought Saddam was getting what he deserved for attacking Kuwait.

This says a lot about the United States of America, and possibly the world. If many of us are already programmed to want revenge and to feel satisfaction when we get it, how easy it is to conjure up support for military retaliation when our enemies strike first?

It makes me think about PeaceJam’s Global Call to Action Issue: Breaking the Cycle of Violence. “One of the first things that we must do is to dismantle our own armed consciousness because we are children of a culture of violence, and our minds have been armed.”

My mind has been armed and this appetite for revenge is the ultimate proof of it.

Jody Williams says, “Emotion without action is irrelevant.” It’s obvious that I have some strong emotions towards the do-badders of the world. But instead of being ashamed of this anger or acting out violently, I’ve realized that I can harness it to fuel my quest for social change, to take action against these ills to create positive change.
Share |
Jasmin M wrote:
Great post, Brad. I think you've reached a pretty valid point. I don't think it's just the US where people cheer and feel good when they are able to take revenge against something that they feel is evil, and it's certainly something to wonder at. Otherwise, you just have everyone avenging everything all the time, and then nothing constructive will get accomplished. I'm going to be on the lookout myself for these kinds of feelings.

Also, thanks for the heads up on Inglorious Bastards and Law Abiding Citizen. I definitely will not ever see them now. It was bad enough that time I tried to watch No Country for Old Men and had to leave the room because it was making me feel sick.
posted 2/3/2010 at 3:14 PM
Bradlee A wrote:
I was just really appalled at the beyond-glorification of killing that went on in Inglourious Basterds. Don't get me wrong, the acts of the Nazis were despicable. It's the glorification of killing them that I am just not comfortable with.

Oh, and thanks, by the way.
posted 2/3/2010 at 3:31 PM
Dawn E wrote:
I really like Brad Pitt, and Tarrantino's movies can be fun, but Ivan and I have decided NOT to see this movie, because it really is just a revenge fantasy that glorifes violence...
posted 2/4/2010 at 8:37 AM
Theresa K wrote:
I felt the same way after seeing Inglorious Basterds. I didn't enjoy it and felt that the violence was unnecessary and portrayed as positive and glamorous. The revenge against Nazis in this movie was definitely not a healthy justice. I had an argument with my brother who is a film major about it. He said that it is ironic because we watch the nazis getting killed horribly and laugh and enjoy it (which I did not), but then later in the film, the big shot Nazis are all watching a movie where a decorated Nazi shoots tons of people. We watch the Nazis watching that movie and are disgusted by their obvious enjoyment of the audience. But if we thought about it, we have been enjoying the whole movie in which we are entertained by the death of Nazis. And possibly Tarrantino is watching us watch his movie and laughing at how hypocritical we are and how we are not that different from the Nazis in some ways. I still do not agree that justifies the violence in the movie but I can see how it makes a statement.
posted 2/4/2010 at 9:08 AM
Jen C wrote:
I think that the important thing about a statement in a movie like this that it needs to be obvious enough that people will catch it. I haven't really seen tarrantino movies, except for parts of Pulp Fiction, which made me not want to see other movie's of his. He may be making a statement, but if he is the only one that gets it, than the movie is simple a tone of humorous violence. Like I said, I haven't seen all of Pulp Fiction, but I have heard how funny the scene is where the two assassins are arguing and accidentally shoot that guy in the back of the car. When people tell me about that scene they laugh, there is no deeper meaning to them, its funny. In my mind, if you are going to make a statement, make it honest. I frankly think it would be way more powerful if Tarrentino, instead of making these statements hidden in funny violence, came out and said "I just made millions of dollars off of another movie because people who see my movies love to see other people dye and in pain. What does this day about us?" The truth is that by hiding behind this idea that he is glorifying violence to make a point, but never actually speaking about the problem of violence in our community, than he is a part of the problem fueling the worst part of humans. Obviously, i really don't respect him.
In terms of the other stuff, I agree with Brad that we fight our socialized ideas of revenge, by connecting to other through service and discussion. We need to have a story to the bad guy. The real violent movies that make you question yourself are the ones that show these messed-up adults who do messed up things and get you to hate them, and then turn around and tell you how that adult was abused and beaten as a child, as was made to be the way they were. They give you a humanity to connect with, even in that bad guys.
I think in terms of violence in out global culture, it is beginning to shift. I believe we are moving from a patriarch to a matriarch, and ever so slowly we are beginning to see the true cost of political domination, of violence as a options, of economies based individual survival. In seeing the effect of these things all over the world, I believe we are beginning to make huge decisions based more on inclusion, global community, and environmental sustainability. For me, I see this in Obama being our president, but more personally, I see it in the women and men involved with PeaceJam, and AmeriCorps and other organizations that are connecting us globally through our common humanity and experience.

So that was a pretty big tangent,great blog Brad, very thought provoking. Got to get back to work now.
posted 2/4/2010 at 3:17 PM
© 2008 - 2012 The PeaceJam Foundation