Get started with your PeaceJam education through our programs, curriculum, and presentations
Connect with PeaceJammers and learn about the people who inspire us
Get involved with the Global Call to Action and PeaceJam's Service Learning programs
Distance and Oppression
Posted 2/12/2010 at 10:08 AM by Theresa K
The PeaceJam website encourages me to follow current events and what is going on in the world more so than I did before this year. I read the newspaper and followed big stories online before but now I am personally invested in some situations. The green movement in Iran, the violence in the Congo, and the struggle for autonomy by Tibet. PeaceJam has brought these human rights struggles out of the news articles and into my mind constantly. The fact that I live in a different country from these issues used to create some kind of emotional distance. Now I feel that the space between me and people who struggle for basic needs and rights is consistently shrinking. Maybe it is because of the internet and how easy it is to keep updated on current events. Maybe it is because I hear about high school students in my city doing Global Call to Action projects on these issues. The philosopher Peter Singer argues that everyone has a moral obligation to prevent bad things from happening and that suffering and death from lack of food, water, and medical care are bad.
Peter Singer wrote:
"The fact that a person is physically near to us, so that we have personal contact with him, may make it more likely that we shall assist him, but this does not show that we ought to help him rather than another who happens to be further away. If we accept any principle of impartiality, universalizability, equality, or whatever, we cannot discriminate against someone merely because he is far away from us (or we are far away from him)."

I have been thinking a lot about oppression and how I do not relate to oppressors. I feel anger and disgust towards people who would participate in taking away basic human rights of others. The government of Iran, the soldiers in the Congo. One of the principles of nonviolence that I struggle with is blaming the act of oppression and not the oppressors. I believe strongly that people are defined by their decisions and their actions. But the only way to defeat the oppressors is to rise above their crude, backward methods of violence and show them courtesy. That way the oppressed gain the upper hand and become irreproachable. Paul Farmer talks about the concept of "structural violence" in his books Mountains by Mountains and Pathologies of Power. He says that structural violence is the assault on human dignity and constraint on freedom resulting from historically given social and economic conditions such as extreme poverty and racism. I need to think of oppression in a more complex way rather than demonizing the "bad guys" or the "government". Many people unintentionally contribute to oppression though they wouldn't identify themselves as oppressors. The system serves them so they are happy with the status quo. In some cases I might be an oppressor by the products that I buy or the things that I say. I hope to concentrate my efforts on making the voice of the vulnerable heard instead of being angry and avoid oppressing others through my thoughtless actions like the plague.
Share |
Jen C wrote:
I am completely with you Teresa. I agree that PeaceJam has made me look so much more closely at what is happening, and actually try and take responsibility for it. I think that PeaceJam has proven to me that what you were saying about distance isn't just physical distance, it is also distance in awareness. I know that for me learning these stories helps me to connect and act. I think it is all about connection, all about finding the commonality in people and then using that to connect and be angry and upset for them.
posted 2/12/2010 at 10:19 AM
Pantea B wrote:
Theresa, you couldn't have said it better! Just last week at our LA Training we did the oppression/violence exercise from our Ambassadors curriculum. Mary pointed out how important it was to really understand the definition in different contexts and I pointed out how it's not as black and white as the "bad guys" and us "good people". I also mentioned how not once in all of my interactions with Shirin Ebadi, Archbishop Tutu, and the Dalia Lama I've ever even sensed the smallest feeling that they were oppressed in anyway! And coming from where they come, having gone through and still going through what they are, it's amazing that oppressed is the last thing that would come to mind when meeting these individuals. One lady mentioned how "oppression" is a state of mind and I really couldn't agree more with her. I'm so glad that someone else too is thinking about these things! Thank you for this thoughtful post. It would have been great to have you at our oppression discussion last week and I can't wait to see each of your beautiful faces next week so we can pick up some of these topics again and discuss them face to face.
posted 2/12/2010 at 11:47 AM
Mary M wrote:
Oh Theresa, you are really so wise. Even though Pani made me sound eloquent in my comments from last week, I too struggle with the separation of the oppressor from the action. It's difficult, because I tend to think that there must be some point where you really can just hate the "bad people." Like the people who ignite genocide or or corrupt governments who allow injustices and human rights violations to occur or are themselves the perpetrators. It's hard not to blame and hate these people. I think the point is really that those feelings only add more negativity to the situation. Like you said we need to fight the oppression not the oppressor. And in a lot of cases, the most effective way to fight the oppression (the act, or state of oppression) could be reaching out to the "oppressor." This is especially true in our everyday lives. And now I think I've lost myself in rhetoric but I really identify with you message, which you have stated so eloquently.
posted 2/12/2010 at 1:38 PM
© 2008 - 2012 The PeaceJam Foundation