Get started with your PeaceJam education through our programs, curriculum, and presentations
Connect with PeaceJammers and learn about the people who inspire us
Get involved with the Global Call to Action and PeaceJam's Service Learning programs
A Look at BP 60 years ago...
Posted 6/16/2010 at 3:49 PM by Chanti C
BP is getting a lot of attention as of late for their massive oil spill in the Gulf, one which, to date, has leaked a horrific quantity of spilled oil -- as I type this, it is estimated that 76,282,429 gallons have leaked into the Gulf -- but that number will be even higher by the time I end this post. This is absolutely outrageous and The White House says the spill is probably the greatest environmental disaster the US has ever faced, with the true impact on surrounding ecosystems still remaining unknown. Experts say it could take months or even years to fully comprehend the gravity of the situation -- the depth of the spill, the use of chemicals, the impact on the environment and human populations.

As I was reading more about this horrific disaster, I came across a Democracy Now! article which caught my attention -- an article about BP's history, an organization which used to be known as the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. I read a little more...

Essentially, the organization that we now know as British Petroleum (BP) used to be the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Back in the early 1900s, a bunch of Geologists discovered that Iran was literally sitting on an ocean of oil. A deal was quickly struck with the corrupt Iranian monarchy -- they were all paid off by the company -- and won the rights to all of oil in the country. The deal mandated that only the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company could drill, extract, ship and sell the oil found in the country. This oil was used to power the British empire in the 20s, 30s and 40s. Britain itself has no natural oil, nor did any of their colonies, so all of the oil from Iran powered British factories, cars, and the British Royal Navy...

After WWII, as nationalist and anti-colonialist sentiment swept through the world, Iranians decided that they wanted to (rightfully!) nationalize their oil supply and elected Mohammad Mosaddegh to power, a man who had a strong interest in reinvesting the profits from oil back into Iran for development purposes. The Iranian parliament voted unanimously to nationalize the oil industry.

This, of course, scared and angered the British, who had been relying on this oil in countless ways. Steven Kinzer, former New York Times Reporter, speaks to this in this Democracy Now! clip about how the overthrow of the Mosaddegh government in 1953 (the first CIA overthrow, may I add) ultimately led to great instability in Iran and how BP played a key role in bringing the Shah to power for the next 25 years in Iran, which in turn produced the explosion of the late '70s that produced the Islamic regime. And who woulda ever thunk that the same corporation that helped to overthrow a government, destabilize a country and put an oppressive ruler into power... would leak an absurd amount of oil into the Gulf 60 years later and cause untold damage to human, animal, and aquatic populations? And actually, I shouldn't find it too surprising. Somehow I find that dirty hands in the past tend to lead to dirty hands in the present.

BP: I'm watching you! Just thought I'd share a little BP history with you all - interesting to research corporations and seeing where they've previously left their footprint, huh?

P.S. Now, at the end of my post, 76,279,754 gallons have been leaked into the Gulf... so in the time it took me to write this, 2675 more gallons have flooded into the water. Sigh.
Share |
Jasmin M wrote:
Chanti, that's really interesting information. I learned a very small bit about Middle Eastern history when I took an energy policy class, and it's always been regrettable to me that our schools never take a look at this region. It might help alleviate a lot of problems.

And I can't believe how much oil is gushing out of that rig. It's disgusting.
posted 6/17/2010 at 2:46 PM
Alan C wrote:
I've really been overwhelmed by the size and scope of this catastrophe, but I also think I've become a bit too jaded in past years about the influence large companies have had over the past 20 years in terms of deregulation. It's sad that the talking points of one of the major US political parties seems to believe that businesses will self regulate, and the other major "party" doesn't have the power/influence/desire? to create means by which to protect it's citizens, not just protect it's businesses.

My hope is that the fallout from this horrible accident will show other companies that self regulation, and safety is in their best interests...

but my jaded side thinks business as usual will continue. (don't get caught, and if you do, spend more on marketing programs to sway public opinion... than actual cleanup)

posted 6/17/2010 at 3:18 PM
Alan C wrote:
I am annoyed that I didn't think about this view before, but here is a great little article from Asia Times that pretty much equates to:
What BP is doing to America is pretty much what American companies have done and are doing to the rest of the world

It starts off with a fictional account of what BP's CEO should have said to congress (or more rightly, what The Asia Times would like to have said to the US Congress):
"Members of congress, I come here not to apologize but to express my irritation at being here in the first place. BP is a foreign company, and we operated Deepwater in the Gulf of Mexico as an offshore facility regulated as a ship (not a drilling well) under US law. Everything we did was acceptable under US law. We cut corners and costs, in order to produce the oil demanded by your people. Our suppliers such as Halliburton and Transocean are American companies so this is all your fault really. You bought our oil for all this time, and made our shareholders rich, so thank you for that.

Accidents happen, and I am afraid you will have to live with the consequences of this one. Look at the positive side of things. If no oil had leaked, we would have simply sold all of it to your SUV drivers and the resulting carbon dioxide - or C02 - emissions would have polluted the whole world. Instead, all that leaking oil only pollutes the waters off the southern USA, a relatively small part of the world.

If you don’t like my answer, I have one word for you: Bhopal.


Everyone should know about Bhopal. Don't feel bad if you haven't yet.

The Asia Times article goes into a little more detail, but basically: A US company (Union Carbide) ran a pesticide factory in a crowded city in Bhopal, India. Union Carbide had to cut costs, so they cut corners on safety. IN 1984 preventable accident created a deadly gascloud that instantly killed 2,000 people in the surrounding city, and thousands more as time progressed, with additional health and birth abnormalities years later. Union Carbide claimed that it was a foreign company, thus couldn't be tried by Indian courts...

read the article for more
posted 6/18/2010 at 1:24 PM
Brett E wrote:
I've heard all of that before but I had no idea BP was the same oil company. Wow. Weird how things all tie together. Thanks for posting this Alan, great read and important to know.
posted 6/18/2010 at 2:26 PM
Alan C wrote:
brett-
not same oil company, (union carbide isn't even an oil company), the behavior that lead to disaster is the same, but not the company.

the article is trying to make a point that the US is finally experiencing a situation where a foreign company, doing business on american soil err water, has caused environmental damage... which to much of the rest of the world seems very karmatically sound, since american based companies have often caused environmental damage in foreign lands with little or no repercussions. article's author is basically stating that it's nice to see the US get a taste of it's own medicine...

posted 6/18/2010 at 5:41 PM
Dawn E wrote:
This is an extremely interesting thread... thanks so much for posting this, Alan!
posted 6/20/2010 at 9:59 AM
© 2008 - 2012 The PeaceJam Foundation